I've noticed this too. Seeing an increasing trend for some of the newer Biden and Trump appointees (although certainly not all) where they place a lot less emphasis on grades. Wonder if it will have any downstream consequences in the near future. I know the prestige of journals has lessened given less meritocratic or more randomized selection methods. Wonder if we will start to see that with clerkships. I have no opinion either way besides the vague hope that we won't reach a situation where clerkship hiring is based on political signaling above all else because I think that would be quite a loss (I think we're far away from that being the present situation, though).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 1:46 pmThis is overstating it. Hiring is not an exact science. Some people get hired at top boutiques with resumes like the one described. And different offices/firms have different preferences that matter beyond just grades. E.g. many lit boutiques really like people with hard science degrees, national-level athletics, mock trial, or debate backgrounds, or military experience.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 12:58 pmShort answer: no. The top boutiques are looking for something like T14 magna + LR + COA clerkship and/or competitive district clerkship as a baseline. A solid COA clerkship is not going to "repair" a middling transcript.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 7:18 pmHow much can a clerkship "repair" a transcript? Like, for example, if you're merely above-norm at HYS but also lock down a solid COA, does that start to make you more appealing to these shops?
Think about the signal that a middling Harvard transcript + solid COA clerkship sends, especially if you were on FedSoc board and/or JLPP. The signal it sends is "this person doesn't quite have the academic chops we typically look for but is good at networking with conservative judges or has a family connection." That's not a compelling reason to hire a candidate that falls below a firm's usual hiring guidelines.
Also incidentally I think the "middling grades plus liberal COA" resume is becoming a lot more common than it used to be with the new Biden judges, many of whom hire for background and demonstrated commitment to the cause just like Fed Soc judges have historically.
Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
If you browse KH's associates from Harvard and Chicago, you will find a bunch of people who grad cum laude/no honors with no LR and clerked for judges that very much hire ideologically hahaAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 12:58 pmShort answer: no. The top boutiques are looking for something like T14 magna + LR + COA clerkship and/or competitive district clerkship as a baseline. A solid COA clerkship is not going to "repair" a middling transcript.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 7:18 pmHow much can a clerkship "repair" a transcript? Like, for example, if you're merely above-norm at HYS but also lock down a solid COA, does that start to make you more appealing to these shops?
Think about the signal that a middling Harvard transcript + solid COA clerkship sends, especially if you were on FedSoc board and/or JLPP. The signal it sends is "this person doesn't quite have the academic chops we typically look for but is good at networking with conservative judges or has a family connection." That's not a compelling reason to hire a candidate that falls below a firm's usual hiring guidelines.
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
Kellogg is looking for more than just grades. As for the associates with grades in the range you describe, gender is doing more work than ideology. Like many firms where billing 2500+ is common, Kellogg has difficulty retaining female associates and is working had to correct that imbalance.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:06 pmIf you browse KH's associates from Harvard and Chicago, you will find a bunch of people who grad cum laude/no honors with no LR and clerked for judges that very much hire ideologically hahaAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 12:58 pmShort answer: no. The top boutiques are looking for something like T14 magna + LR + COA clerkship and/or competitive district clerkship as a baseline. A solid COA clerkship is not going to "repair" a middling transcript.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 7:18 pmHow much can a clerkship "repair" a transcript? Like, for example, if you're merely above-norm at HYS but also lock down a solid COA, does that start to make you more appealing to these shops?
Think about the signal that a middling Harvard transcript + solid COA clerkship sends, especially if you were on FedSoc board and/or JLPP. The signal it sends is "this person doesn't quite have the academic chops we typically look for but is good at networking with conservative judges or has a family connection." That's not a compelling reason to hire a candidate that falls below a firm's usual hiring guidelines.
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
Not to be annoying, but I just looked at their website and 6/8 of the associates that fit into that box are menAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:31 pmKellogg is looking for more than just grades. As for the associates with grades in the range you describe, gender is doing more work than ideology. Like many firms where billing 2500+ is common, Kellogg has difficulty retaining female associates and is working had to correct that imbalance.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:06 pmIf you browse KH's associates from Harvard and Chicago, you will find a bunch of people who grad cum laude/no honors with no LR and clerked for judges that very much hire ideologically hahaAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 12:58 pmShort answer: no. The top boutiques are looking for something like T14 magna + LR + COA clerkship and/or competitive district clerkship as a baseline. A solid COA clerkship is not going to "repair" a middling transcript.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 7:18 pmHow much can a clerkship "repair" a transcript? Like, for example, if you're merely above-norm at HYS but also lock down a solid COA, does that start to make you more appealing to these shops?
Think about the signal that a middling Harvard transcript + solid COA clerkship sends, especially if you were on FedSoc board and/or JLPP. The signal it sends is "this person doesn't quite have the academic chops we typically look for but is good at networking with conservative judges or has a family connection." That's not a compelling reason to hire a candidate that falls below a firm's usual hiring guidelines.
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
But in fairness, graduating cum laude from HLS with an appellate clerkship makes you competitive most anywhereAnonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 12:58 amNot to be annoying, but I just looked at their website and 6/8 of the associates that fit into that box are menAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:31 pmKellogg is looking for more than just grades. As for the associates with grades in the range you describe, gender is doing more work than ideology. Like many firms where billing 2500+ is common, Kellogg has difficulty retaining female associates and is working had to correct that imbalance.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:06 pmIf you browse KH's associates from Harvard and Chicago, you will find a bunch of people who grad cum laude/no honors with no LR and clerked for judges that very much hire ideologically hahaAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 12:58 pmShort answer: no. The top boutiques are looking for something like T14 magna + LR + COA clerkship and/or competitive district clerkship as a baseline. A solid COA clerkship is not going to "repair" a middling transcript.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 7:18 pmHow much can a clerkship "repair" a transcript? Like, for example, if you're merely above-norm at HYS but also lock down a solid COA, does that start to make you more appealing to these shops?
Think about the signal that a middling Harvard transcript + solid COA clerkship sends, especially if you were on FedSoc board and/or JLPP. The signal it sends is "this person doesn't quite have the academic chops we typically look for but is good at networking with conservative judges or has a family connection." That's not a compelling reason to hire a candidate that falls below a firm's usual hiring guidelines.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
The box is gerrymandered. Other associates went to lower-ranked schools than Harvard and Chicago, got similar grades, and clerked for liberal judges. No would think they aren't qualified. It's not believable that elite boutiques like Susman or Kellogg give affirmative action to mediocre FedSoc applicants when they have their pick of the appellate clerk litter.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 12:58 amNot to be annoying, but I just looked at their website and 6/8 of the associates that fit into that box are menAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:31 pmKellogg is looking for more than just grades. As for the associates with grades in the range you describe, gender is doing more work than ideology. Like many firms where billing 2500+ is common, Kellogg has difficulty retaining female associates and is working had to correct that imbalance.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 8:06 pmIf you browse KH's associates from Harvard and Chicago, you will find a bunch of people who grad cum laude/no honors with no LR and clerked for judges that very much hire ideologically hahaAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 12:58 pmShort answer: no. The top boutiques are looking for something like T14 magna + LR + COA clerkship and/or competitive district clerkship as a baseline. A solid COA clerkship is not going to "repair" a middling transcript.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 7:18 pmHow much can a clerkship "repair" a transcript? Like, for example, if you're merely above-norm at HYS but also lock down a solid COA, does that start to make you more appealing to these shops?
Think about the signal that a middling Harvard transcript + solid COA clerkship sends, especially if you were on FedSoc board and/or JLPP. The signal it sends is "this person doesn't quite have the academic chops we typically look for but is good at networking with conservative judges or has a family connection." That's not a compelling reason to hire a candidate that falls below a firm's usual hiring guidelines.
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
Cum laude with a COA is competitive at all these places, including Bartlit Beck.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 1:01 pmDon't disagree but think you're overestimating how selective some of these places are. I know people from my HYS who have gone to Susman, W&C, MTO, etc. (so, admittedly, not necessarily the true boutiques like Bartlit or whatever) with no LR and good grades that are not magna (probably more like ~top 30%).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 12:58 pmShort answer: no. The top boutiques are looking for something like T14 magna + LR + COA clerkship and/or competitive district clerkship as a baseline. A solid COA clerkship is not going to "repair" a middling transcript.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 7:18 pmHow much can a clerkship "repair" a transcript? Like, for example, if you're merely above-norm at HYS but also lock down a solid COA, does that start to make you more appealing to these shops?
Think about the signal that a middling Harvard transcript + solid COA clerkship sends, especially if you were on FedSoc board and/or JLPP. The signal it sends is "this person doesn't quite have the academic chops we typically look for but is good at networking with conservative judges or has a family connection." That's not a compelling reason to hire a candidate that falls below a firm's usual hiring guidelines.
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
Cum laude from where? Harvard probably, Cornell probably not absent other extraordinary circumstances.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 8:12 pmCum laude with a COA is competitive at all these places, including Bartlit Beck.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 1:01 pmDon't disagree but think you're overestimating how selective some of these places are. I know people from my HYS who have gone to Susman, W&C, MTO, etc. (so, admittedly, not necessarily the true boutiques like Bartlit or whatever) with no LR and good grades that are not magna (probably more like ~top 30%).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 12:58 pmShort answer: no. The top boutiques are looking for something like T14 magna + LR + COA clerkship and/or competitive district clerkship as a baseline. A solid COA clerkship is not going to "repair" a middling transcript.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 7:18 pmHow much can a clerkship "repair" a transcript? Like, for example, if you're merely above-norm at HYS but also lock down a solid COA, does that start to make you more appealing to these shops?
Think about the signal that a middling Harvard transcript + solid COA clerkship sends, especially if you were on FedSoc board and/or JLPP. The signal it sends is "this person doesn't quite have the academic chops we typically look for but is good at networking with conservative judges or has a family connection." That's not a compelling reason to hire a candidate that falls below a firm's usual hiring guidelines.
I think the previous poster was right when they said the prototypical mold for a top boutique hire is something like T14 magna + COA and/or district clerkship + LR + good personality. Note that T14 magna isn't HLS magna; it's probably closer to HLS cum laude.
Cum laude from a T14 with a COA is enough to put you in play anywhere, but it's not compelling for the top boutiques absent other extraordinary information. That candidate might get an interview here and there but needs to make a significant good impression to stand out and get an offer. Compelling these days is like HLS magna + feeder COA + a second great clerkship + some other plus factors like Rhodes/military background + influential publications.
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
Again, I think hiring is pretty idiosyncratic. I work at one of the firms listed above and while I have some of the criteria you’re describing (hys top 10ish, feeder level COA, some unicorn extras), I don’t exclusively work with those types of people and I think I have one of the better resumes of my associate cohort. And plenty of my friends / co clerks with those types of profiles didn’t have as much success in recruiting. I generally think that there’s some basic level of academic success / prestige to be considered in the ordinary case; let’s call it something like COA + top 5/10 from a lower t14 or top 20ish from hys. Then beyond that, normal hiring criteria like fit, practice group interest, recommendations, previous work experience etc all matter a great deal. We have turned away double feeder close to Sears prize winners while offering far less “compelling” candidates so let’s not reduce this all to objective academic oriented criteria here.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 12:39 amCum laude from where? Harvard probably, Cornell probably not absent other extraordinary circumstances.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 8:12 pmCum laude with a COA is competitive at all these places, including Bartlit Beck.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 1:01 pmDon't disagree but think you're overestimating how selective some of these places are. I know people from my HYS who have gone to Susman, W&C, MTO, etc. (so, admittedly, not necessarily the true boutiques like Bartlit or whatever) with no LR and good grades that are not magna (probably more like ~top 30%).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 12:58 pmShort answer: no. The top boutiques are looking for something like T14 magna + LR + COA clerkship and/or competitive district clerkship as a baseline. A solid COA clerkship is not going to "repair" a middling transcript.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 7:18 pmHow much can a clerkship "repair" a transcript? Like, for example, if you're merely above-norm at HYS but also lock down a solid COA, does that start to make you more appealing to these shops?
Think about the signal that a middling Harvard transcript + solid COA clerkship sends, especially if you were on FedSoc board and/or JLPP. The signal it sends is "this person doesn't quite have the academic chops we typically look for but is good at networking with conservative judges or has a family connection." That's not a compelling reason to hire a candidate that falls below a firm's usual hiring guidelines.
I think the previous poster was right when they said the prototypical mold for a top boutique hire is something like T14 magna + COA and/or district clerkship + LR + good personality. Note that T14 magna isn't HLS magna; it's probably closer to HLS cum laude.
Cum laude from a T14 with a COA is enough to put you in play anywhere, but it's not compelling for the top boutiques absent other extraordinary information. That candidate might get an interview here and there but needs to make a significant good impression to stand out and get an offer. Compelling these days is like HLS magna + feeder COA + a second great clerkship + some other plus factors like Rhodes/military background + influential publications.
That being said, sure these firms are the most competitive places in law pretty much and have a much higher academic floor than any larger firm, even in the DC market. And people should be aware of that. Competition among clerks and high achieving students is significant and the firms know it. But more than one way to get hired; if someone is over the academic floor, I’d encourage them to apply to any firm.
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
I should be clear. Cum laude from HLS.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 12:39 amCum laude from where? Harvard probably, Cornell probably not absent other extraordinary circumstances.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 8:12 pmCum laude with a COA is competitive at all these places, including Bartlit Beck.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 1:01 pmDon't disagree but think you're overestimating how selective some of these places are. I know people from my HYS who have gone to Susman, W&C, MTO, etc. (so, admittedly, not necessarily the true boutiques like Bartlit or whatever) with no LR and good grades that are not magna (probably more like ~top 30%).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 12:58 pmShort answer: no. The top boutiques are looking for something like T14 magna + LR + COA clerkship and/or competitive district clerkship as a baseline. A solid COA clerkship is not going to "repair" a middling transcript.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 7:18 pmHow much can a clerkship "repair" a transcript? Like, for example, if you're merely above-norm at HYS but also lock down a solid COA, does that start to make you more appealing to these shops?
Think about the signal that a middling Harvard transcript + solid COA clerkship sends, especially if you were on FedSoc board and/or JLPP. The signal it sends is "this person doesn't quite have the academic chops we typically look for but is good at networking with conservative judges or has a family connection." That's not a compelling reason to hire a candidate that falls below a firm's usual hiring guidelines.
I think the previous poster was right when they said the prototypical mold for a top boutique hire is something like T14 magna + COA and/or district clerkship + LR + good personality. Note that T14 magna isn't HLS magna; it's probably closer to HLS cum laude.
Cum laude from a T14 with a COA is enough to put you in play anywhere, but it's not compelling for the top boutiques absent other extraordinary information. That candidate might get an interview here and there but needs to make a significant good impression to stand out and get an offer. Compelling these days is like HLS magna + feeder COA + a second great clerkship + some other plus factors like Rhodes/military background + influential publications.
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
No, cum laude from any T14 (and Texas) plus a COA is objectively competitive for almost all these firms. You can go through the webpages if you feel the need. I know people involved in hiring at a few of these firms and they do not parse grades anywhere near as closely as people on this board seem to think. Latin honors and a respectable clerkship get you a close look. Then, the focus is more on fit and personality. Practicing law is not like law school. And it's obvious after an interview that many top students do not possess the interpersonal skills and common sense that firms desire.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2024 10:09 amI should be clear. Cum laude from HLS.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 12:39 amCum laude from where? Harvard probably, Cornell probably not absent other extraordinary circumstances.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 8:12 pmCum laude with a COA is competitive at all these places, including Bartlit Beck.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 1:01 pmDon't disagree but think you're overestimating how selective some of these places are. I know people from my HYS who have gone to Susman, W&C, MTO, etc. (so, admittedly, not necessarily the true boutiques like Bartlit or whatever) with no LR and good grades that are not magna (probably more like ~top 30%).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 12:58 pmShort answer: no. The top boutiques are looking for something like T14 magna + LR + COA clerkship and/or competitive district clerkship as a baseline. A solid COA clerkship is not going to "repair" a middling transcript.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 7:18 pmHow much can a clerkship "repair" a transcript? Like, for example, if you're merely above-norm at HYS but also lock down a solid COA, does that start to make you more appealing to these shops?
Think about the signal that a middling Harvard transcript + solid COA clerkship sends, especially if you were on FedSoc board and/or JLPP. The signal it sends is "this person doesn't quite have the academic chops we typically look for but is good at networking with conservative judges or has a family connection." That's not a compelling reason to hire a candidate that falls below a firm's usual hiring guidelines.
I think the previous poster was right when they said the prototypical mold for a top boutique hire is something like T14 magna + COA and/or district clerkship + LR + good personality. Note that T14 magna isn't HLS magna; it's probably closer to HLS cum laude.
Cum laude from a T14 with a COA is enough to put you in play anywhere, but it's not compelling for the top boutiques absent other extraordinary information. That candidate might get an interview here and there but needs to make a significant good impression to stand out and get an offer. Compelling these days is like HLS magna + feeder COA + a second great clerkship + some other plus factors like Rhodes/military background + influential publications.
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
Folks are talking past each other because they mean different things when they say "competitive." Most elite boutiques have an academic floor below which candidates need not apply. Past that threshold, better grades and credentials continue to strengthen an app measurably, but they do not alone guarantee success. Even SCOTUS clerks occasionally get rejected - not often, but it happens. It's somewhat misleading to draw strong inferences from the bios you see on the websites. The nonconventional hires have a lot going for them that may not be visible to the naked eye.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Feb 29, 2024 11:14 pmNo, cum laude from any T14 (and Texas) plus a COA is objectively competitive for almost all these firms. You can go through the webpages if you feel the need. I know people involved in hiring at a few of these firms and they do not parse grades anywhere near as closely as people on this board seem to think. Latin honors and a respectable clerkship get you a close look. Then, the focus is more on fit and personality. Practicing law is not like law school. And it's obvious after an interview that many top students do not possess the interpersonal skills and common sense that firms desire.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2024 10:09 amI should be clear. Cum laude from HLS.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 12:39 amCum laude from where? Harvard probably, Cornell probably not absent other extraordinary circumstances.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 8:12 pmCum laude with a COA is competitive at all these places, including Bartlit Beck.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 1:01 pmDon't disagree but think you're overestimating how selective some of these places are. I know people from my HYS who have gone to Susman, W&C, MTO, etc. (so, admittedly, not necessarily the true boutiques like Bartlit or whatever) with no LR and good grades that are not magna (probably more like ~top 30%).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 12:58 pmShort answer: no. The top boutiques are looking for something like T14 magna + LR + COA clerkship and/or competitive district clerkship as a baseline. A solid COA clerkship is not going to "repair" a middling transcript.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 7:18 pmHow much can a clerkship "repair" a transcript? Like, for example, if you're merely above-norm at HYS but also lock down a solid COA, does that start to make you more appealing to these shops?
Think about the signal that a middling Harvard transcript + solid COA clerkship sends, especially if you were on FedSoc board and/or JLPP. The signal it sends is "this person doesn't quite have the academic chops we typically look for but is good at networking with conservative judges or has a family connection." That's not a compelling reason to hire a candidate that falls below a firm's usual hiring guidelines.
I think the previous poster was right when they said the prototypical mold for a top boutique hire is something like T14 magna + COA and/or district clerkship + LR + good personality. Note that T14 magna isn't HLS magna; it's probably closer to HLS cum laude.
Cum laude from a T14 with a COA is enough to put you in play anywhere, but it's not compelling for the top boutiques absent other extraordinary information. That candidate might get an interview here and there but needs to make a significant good impression to stand out and get an offer. Compelling these days is like HLS magna + feeder COA + a second great clerkship + some other plus factors like Rhodes/military background + influential publications.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
What is this in SLS terms, do you know?
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
it's top 40% at HLS. I'd guess top 40% at SLS is ~1/3 H's
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
Cum laude from HLS is ridiculously easy to get. HLS has tons of soft woke courses (transgender law, CRT, labor law, etc.). Graduate with honors from SLS, Chicago, or Yale and then we'll talk
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
I don't think either SLS or YLS do graduation honors, but okay Chicago boy. Also lmao "labor law" is now a "soft woke" course.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:08 pmCum laude from HLS is ridiculously easy to get. HLS has tons of soft woke courses (transgender law, CRT, labor law, etc.). Graduate with honors from SLS, Chicago, or Yale and then we'll talk
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
Incredibly sick of woke law school courses like labor law. Since when did analyzing caselaw surrounding a statutory, constitutional, and administrative framework become a thing. We don't do petty stuff like that at Chicago.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:21 pmI don't think either SLS or YLS do graduation honors, but okay Chicago boy. Also lmao "labor law" is now a "soft woke" course.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:08 pmCum laude from HLS is ridiculously easy to get. HLS has tons of soft woke courses (transgender law, CRT, labor law, etc.). Graduate with honors from SLS, Chicago, or Yale and then we'll talk
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
I love TLSAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:53 pmIncredibly sick of woke law school courses like labor law. Since when did analyzing caselaw surrounding a statutory, constitutional, and administrative framework become a thing. We don't do petty stuff like that at Chicago.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:21 pmI don't think either SLS or YLS do graduation honors, but okay Chicago boy. Also lmao "labor law" is now a "soft woke" course.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:08 pmCum laude from HLS is ridiculously easy to get. HLS has tons of soft woke courses (transgender law, CRT, labor law, etc.). Graduate with honors from SLS, Chicago, or Yale and then we'll talk
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
HLS isn't the only school with massive grade inflation. Cf. NU. But Latin honors are relative, and all students have the same courses available to them, at least in theory.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:08 pmCum laude from HLS is ridiculously easy to get. HLS has tons of soft woke courses (transgender law, CRT, labor law, etc.). Graduate with honors from SLS, Chicago, or Yale and then we'll talk
To your point, though, it is ridiculous that many judges and employers view top 40% at HLS as equivalent to top 10% at a T14. The latter is much, much more difficult.
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
Nothing makes my blood boil more than people who say HYS. Harvard is has declined precipitously over the past 40 years.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 3:05 pmHLS isn't the only school with massive grade inflation. Cf. NU. But Latin honors are relative, and all students have the same courses available to them, at least in theory.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:08 pmCum laude from HLS is ridiculously easy to get. HLS has tons of soft woke courses (transgender law, CRT, labor law, etc.). Graduate with honors from SLS, Chicago, or Yale and then we'll talk
To your point, though, it is ridiculous that many judges and employers view top 40% at HLS as equivalent to top 10% at a T14. The latter is much, much more difficult.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
Maybe some judges sure. But I feel like most employers see magna level grades from CCN and some of the mid T14s as very good and better than cum laude harvard. Most of the heavy Harvard weighting seems to be for judges and OCI not necessarily post-graduation. But what do I know, I don't do the hiring, this is just based on instinct.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 3:05 pmHLS isn't the only school with massive grade inflation. Cf. NU. But Latin honors are relative, and all students have the same courses available to them, at least in theory.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:08 pmCum laude from HLS is ridiculously easy to get. HLS has tons of soft woke courses (transgender law, CRT, labor law, etc.). Graduate with honors from SLS, Chicago, or Yale and then we'll talk
To your point, though, it is ridiculous that many judges and employers view top 40% at HLS as equivalent to top 10% at a T14. The latter is much, much more difficult.
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
Maybe you should get some hobbies.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 8:03 pmNothing makes my blood boil more than people who say HYS. Harvard is has declined precipitously over the past 40 years.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 3:05 pmHLS isn't the only school with massive grade inflation. Cf. NU. But Latin honors are relative, and all students have the same courses available to them, at least in theory.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:08 pmCum laude from HLS is ridiculously easy to get. HLS has tons of soft woke courses (transgender law, CRT, labor law, etc.). Graduate with honors from SLS, Chicago, or Yale and then we'll talk
To your point, though, it is ridiculous that many judges and employers view top 40% at HLS as equivalent to top 10% at a T14. The latter is much, much more difficult.
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
You're right, you don't know. For many elite outcomes, employers only take from the T6 (yes boys and girls, the T6 was, is, and will remain a thing). For many of those elite outcomes, cum laude from Harvard is the prerequisite.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 10:30 pmMaybe some judges sure. But I feel like most employers see magna level grades from CCN and some of the mid T14s as very good and better than cum laude harvard. Most of the heavy Harvard weighting seems to be for judges and OCI not necessarily post-graduation. But what do I know, I don't do the hiring, this is just based on instinct.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 3:05 pmHLS isn't the only school with massive grade inflation. Cf. NU. But Latin honors are relative, and all students have the same courses available to them, at least in theory.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:08 pmCum laude from HLS is ridiculously easy to get. HLS has tons of soft woke courses (transgender law, CRT, labor law, etc.). Graduate with honors from SLS, Chicago, or Yale and then we'll talk
To your point, though, it is ridiculous that many judges and employers view top 40% at HLS as equivalent to top 10% at a T14. The latter is much, much more difficult.
-
- Posts: 428968
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerkship Competitiveness for Lit Boutiques
Name these "elite outcomes." I can't think of a single position in law that requires a T6 degree over a T14 degree. That said, of course, most employers (especially on the East Coast) will view top T6 graduates more favorably than top T14 graduates.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 10:31 amYou're right, you don't know. For many elite outcomes, employers only take from the T6 (yes boys and girls, the T6 was, is, and will remain a thing). For many of those elite outcomes, cum laude from Harvard is the prerequisite.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 10:30 pmMaybe some judges sure. But I feel like most employers see magna level grades from CCN and some of the mid T14s as very good and better than cum laude harvard. Most of the heavy Harvard weighting seems to be for judges and OCI not necessarily post-graduation. But what do I know, I don't do the hiring, this is just based on instinct.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 3:05 pmHLS isn't the only school with massive grade inflation. Cf. NU. But Latin honors are relative, and all students have the same courses available to them, at least in theory.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:08 pmCum laude from HLS is ridiculously easy to get. HLS has tons of soft woke courses (transgender law, CRT, labor law, etc.). Graduate with honors from SLS, Chicago, or Yale and then we'll talk
To your point, though, it is ridiculous that many judges and employers view top 40% at HLS as equivalent to top 10% at a T14. The latter is much, much more difficult.
And there are positions that typically fill with HLS magna candidates where one would need to have graduated at or very close to first-in-class at a Duke/Northwestern/Cornell to compete. Things like Bristow Fellow, etc. But for those positions, a high magna or summa candidate from one of the lower T14 schools will have a better chance (all other things like clerkships equal) than a HLS cum laude graduate.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login